March 15th Virtual Study Session
Join RSP for a virtual study session of “Malcolm X Didn’t Dish Out Free Bean Pies.” We will hop on Signal to read in turn and discuss the article together.
- Introductions
- Head count: 5
- Reading
- Started at beginning
- Stopped at paragraph “Besides pitching things to the intermediate,”
- Notes, comments, etc.
- Similar activities by reactionary forces (e.g. Samaritan ministries) of collecting old food and giving it to the needy
- Bourgeois institutions have monopoly on the resources
- Ethics are often within the assumptions of liberalism
- Budgets controlled by the state, reliant on grants, donors, volunteers, etc.
- Paid staff vs. volunteer labor
- Paid staff have connections
- Volunteers don’t have a choice in operations
- Organizations are not reproducable by volunteers, reliant on specialized skills of paid staff
- Starvation as tool of the state, food distro as undermining it
- Other example of police repression: https://www.wtoc.com/2026/03/11/priest-faces-500000-fines-feeding-homeless-amid-lawsuit/
- Problem of temporariness, just not leading to development of class consciousness
- Social services in the USA
- One-sided relationship of producer and consumer
- Social investigation in Peoria
- Hypothesis: Social services being also hard to obtain in the first place
- Homelessness as radicalizing experience
- Classism on part of social service workers
- Individual people who are passionate
- System intentionally designed to be hard to access
- Peoria has better social safety nets than in other parts of rural IL
- Due to generally liberal environment and concessions
- Those who are homeless are ripe for class consciousness as they part of the permanent underclass
- As well as social workers are themselves often struggling and can be radicalized too
- Building class consciousness & education for people (without trying to do a quixotic replication of existing social services, which is doomed to failure)
- Classism on part of social service workers
- Civil Rights / New Left of 60s - 70s
- How to avoid their mistakes? They were operating in a much more limited field
- Talking to people!
- What is stopping us from just talking to people, listening to them, and explaining our views to them?
- Talking to both those in need of help as well as social workers who can be radicalized
- Social media
- Influence vs power
- Engaging with the Left
- Either impenetrable theory or shitposting
- The Right has been able to monetize their propaganda
- They have views that can be communicated based on existing prejudices
- The Left has to deconstruct existing prejudices while also putting forth their own ideas
- There isn’t as much accessible Leftist theory as a result
- Avoiding replication of dependency/passivity of the masses
- BPP - Free Breakfast Program used specifically as consciousness-raising measurement, not specifically for charity
- So that people understand what they deserve
- BPP - Free Breakfast Program used specifically as consciousness-raising measurement, not specifically for charity
- Ex. Community Potluck or other gathering could be a touchpoint to understand people’s viewpoints, then to also educate too
- Revisionist organizations as locking up the advanced masses
- “A better world is possible” vs. “a better world is waiting to be built”
- Seizing the means of production, seizing housing
- Appropiation of what is already there - we are not starting from scratch!
- Especially in context of the USA
- Being able to pitch an ideological vision to people
- If the goal is to unify the proletariat into a movement/party/organization/etc. then communists have to reckon with the different levels of development
- Education towards cooperation AND initiative AND creativity
- As well as get actually good at propaganda and communications
- Similar activities by reactionary forces (e.g. Samaritan ministries) of collecting old food and giving it to the needy
- During Civil Rights movement, contradictions between nationalities ran higher
- BPP and Young Lords had more appeal as a self-defense nationalist organization
- Modern day, racism is more hidden and thus viewed as individual problems
- Drive towards integration and assimilation into American imperialism
- Black national bourgeois and comprador classes
- White chauvinism is dominant in the USA communist (and leftist) movement
- Part of opportunist and revisionist hegemony in USA Marxist scene
- Segregation in Peoria on race and class lines
- Siloing of issues, lack of united front
- Hobbyism, amateurism, people just pick an issue that is important to them and join an org
- Due to middle class makeup of organizations
- No coherent theory of capitalism as a unitary system
All tags: